Why the fake/bogus journals has no impact in real scenario?
Why the fake/bogus journals not impacting in real scenario?
Fake or bogus journals do have some impact in the real scenario, but this impact is largely negative and harmful rather than contributing to the advancement of knowledge.
The effects of such journals can include:
Dilution of Scientific Integrity: Fake journals undermine the credibility and integrity of the academic publishing system. They create an environment where low-quality, unverified, or even plagiarized research can be published, eroding the trust in scholarly communication.
Misleading Researchers: These journals often deceive researchers into believing their work has been peer-reviewed and published in reputable outlets. Authors may waste their research funds on publication fees or tarnish their reputation by associating with such journals.
Influence on Academia: In some cases, researchers in certain countries may be pressured to publish in local, fake journals for career advancement, which can hinder genuine scientific progress and perpetuate the problem.
Dilution of Literature: Fake journals add a vast number of low-quality or irrelevant articles to the scientific literature. This makes it harder for researchers to find high-quality, relevant, and trustworthy research.
Waste of Resources: Authors who submit to fake journals often pay publication fees, which can be a waste of research funds that could have been better spent on legitimate research and publication outlets.
Deception of the Public: Misleading articles from fake journals may find their way into public discourse, potentially affecting public opinion or policy decisions based on misrepresented or flawed science.
Reduced Impact of Genuine Research: As the scientific literature becomes cluttered with low-quality or fraudulent articles, genuine research may be overshadowed or less influential, and the value of scholarly publishing is diminished.
Thanks,
Team - JournalGuardians
Comments
Post a Comment